Photo: © IhorL / Shutterstock.com

Bye, bye oil, hello peace & democracy

We can get rid of oil, is the chief message of a new AirClim report, Phasing out oil. Many of the methods and policies were in fact devised in 1974, and many have been added since.

The report "Phasing out oil" was written just before the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The following events made it even more topical.

Oil emitted about 12.5 billion tonnes of CO₂ in 2021, of a total of 39.7 billion tonnes from fossil fuels, cement and deforestation. It is a big part of the global warming problem.

Oil is now recognised as a problem in other respects as well, not just for the climate and air pollution. Oil dependence became a big issue during the oil crises in 1973 and 1979, and yet again in the early 2010s because of wars in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya.

Over and over again, for more than a century, oil has destabilised the economy through price booms and busts, destabilised democracy, propped up dictators, caused wars and funded wars. Peak Oil, a situation when the world to pump up enough oil to meet the demand, has been yet another menace.

There have been many reasons to kick the habit.

But the oil lobby is strong. Some of its constituents are the oil-producing companies, the “downstream” suppliers, i.e. refiners and service station chains, governments of oil-producing countries, automotive manufacturers and their governments.

Big Oil has gone to battle every day against every effort to limit its power, with an almost infinite budget for lobbying and PR, and it has won most of its battles.

At the 1992 Rio Conference, when the Climate Convention was first negotiated, former oil man president H. W. Bush famously quipped that the “The American way of life is not up for negotiations. Period.”

The report argues that he was factually wrong. “Our lifestyles are up for negotiation all the time. Lifestyles change for all kinds of reasons.” One of the changes comes from technology. “Technology is sometimes lifestyle-neutral. A hybrid car uses less petrol than an equivalent car without a hybrid system, but the driving experience is not very different. Even a battery car is not so different. For consumers, electricity from solar or wind is the same as electricity from fossil fuels. The light from a LED lamp is much the same as that from an incandescent.”

Using less oil must, accordingly, not be a sacrifice. But it serves the oil industry well to say it must.

In 2019, the report says, the majority of oil (66 per cent) was used for transport: road transport (48%) air transport (9%) and sea transport (9%) in the EU.
We have known for more 50 years that oil consumption can be cut with other modes of transportation and less transport. After the oil crises of the 1970s we got much more efficient cars.

In later years we have seen battery cars take off, with hydrogen from renewable electricity as a complement in the near future.

Vehicle emissions are a problem for which a solution already exists, technologically and economically.

15 per cent of EU households and 8 per cent of offices are heated by oil. That can be cut through better insulation – which should have been implemented 30–40 years ago – and eliminated through heat pumps or district heating.

Oil use to generate electricity has been reduced by 80 per cent since 1998. What remains could be replaced with renewables and efficiency, “which should not be very difficult”, according to the report.

Much oil is used to make plastics. Most of it ends up either as landfill or is incinerated. With better organisation most could be reduced, re-used and recycled, so much less oil would be needed.

Should oil be cut from the supply side or the demand side? Do both, says the report. It is important to stop financing, to stop subsidies for use, to tax use etc and to support emerging technologies.

This clearly can create problems.

A “policy of subsidising battery cars for the rich and financing them with higher petrol prices for the poor is arrogant, stupid and dangerous, as the emergence of the Gilets Jaunes demonstrated in France”, says the report: A fast transition is possible, but it has to be just, or it will not happen.

Fredrik Lundberg

The report can be downloaded at: https://www.airclim.org/publications/phasing-out-oil

In this issue

IED review may bring justice to affected citizens

The proposal for the review of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) reveals several improvements, but there are also serious flaws when it comes to reporting and adapting to climate targets.

Editorial: Clean air narrative must include lifestyle changes

Spring has arrived in Sweden and the trees are bursting into leaf. But these are also worrying times ...

Air quality still a major health risk for Europeans

The Covid lockdown led to reduced pollution from traffic in 2020. Nevertheless, 96 per cent of Europeans were exposed to harmful levels of fine particultate matter (PM_2.5).

Will FuelEU Maritime deliver on decarbonisation?

Policymakers should introduce dedicated quotas and incentives to boost demand for hydrogen-based shipping fuels.

Flanders acts on nitrogen pollution

In April the Flemish government presented a proposal to deal with the high levels of nitrogen emissions in the region.

CCS around the world

This is a continuation of an article from the previous issue, here presenting the situation for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in Australia, China and the US.

Bye, bye oil, hello peace & democracy

We can get rid of oil, is the chief message of a new AirClim report, Phasing out oil. Many of the methods and policies were in fact devised in 1974, and many have been added since.

Implications of the Russian military attack on Ukrainian nuclear facilities

Russian military attacks on Ukrainian power plants were the first real example of an event that was always considered a theoretical scenario.

The Paris Agreement climate goal is within reach, but requires steep emission reductions

Over the past year Climate Action Network Europe, Climate Analytics and AirClim have been working on an analysis of pathways ...

Are we really on track to limit temperature rise below 2°C?

A recent Nature article by Malte Meinshausen et al.1 received considerable attention in the media under the headline that current countries’ pledges to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may limit global temperature rise to just below 2°C.

EU carbon market must deliver faster emission cuts

There is an overestimation of the carbon-allowances needed and the current proposal will even be inadequate to meet the 2030 target, according to new research.

Fossil advertising – halfway towards a ban

A campaign that is calling for a ban on fossil advertising at EU level is well underway. Its main objective is to achieve an EU ban on fossil advertising through a citizens’ initiative that is currently collecting signatures throughout the EU.

Planning for a green recovery

While the war is still ongoing, the Ukrainian environmental movement has already started to plan for how sustainabilty can be integrated in the rebuilding of their country.

Climate change and other threats to marine life in the Baltic Sea

Researchers conclude that climate change represents the overarching factor, affecting almost all the other natural and human-induced factors in the Baltic Sea.

Marine heatwaves forecasted

Marine heatwaves (MHWs) are extended periods of extremely warm seawater. They can have very serious consequences both ecologically and socioeconomically.

1.5°C: a tipping point for the Arctic

A recently published briefing by Climate Analytics summarises some of the observed and projected impacts on the physical, biological, and human dimensions ...